Converts the 142-slide talk deck into a 6-part first-person series (plus a landing page) for phaedrusqualitybookkeeping.com/wiki/. Slide references are PDF page numbers. The deck’s spoken storytelling beats β windshield, sonar, muffler, “Exactly!!” β are preserved as written scenes; build-slide sequences collapse into single figures.
Published chapters: Part 1 β Driving with a Dirty Windshield Β· Part 2 β A Sonar Engineer Looks at Accounting (draft)
Decisions (locked 2026-07-26)
- Series title: Seeing Your Business Better, with Zen and the Art of Weekly Accounting as the recurring section-divider motif inside chapters (the deck’s divider art carries over).
- Branding: Co-branded β PQB hosts; each page carries a “from the Weekly Accounting system” byline linking to weeklyaccounting.com/fullbook.
- Voice: First-person (John), full credibility receipts in chapter 2.
- CPA line: Kept verbatim.
- CTAs: Chapters 1β5 end with the next-chapter bridge only; chapter 6 carries the single service CTA (talk to us / contact).
- Client data: DTC and home-care figures publish as-is.
- Videos: None recorded yet β pages are text-first, with a video slot reserved at the top of each chapter.
Series architecture
| # | Page (working title) | The story it tells | Source slides |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Seeing Your Business Better (landing) | Why this series exists; map of the journey | 1, 13 |
| 1 | Driving with a Dirty Windshield | The problem: you’re flying blind | 2β11 |
| 2 | A Sonar Engineer Looks at Accounting | Origin story + the 500-year-old map | 12β21 |
| 3 | The Weekly Accounting System | The fix: IFM, the SEQ, and a weekly feedback loop | 22β45 |
| 4 | Unit Economics: The Frequency Codes of Your Business | The guide: CAC, LTGP, and the signal in the noise | 46β71 |
| 5 | Implementing Weekly Accounting | The journey: Troubled β World Class | 72β96 |
| 6 | Case Study: When Growth Is a Vanity Metric | DTC story: 6x growth, collapsing unit economics, what to do | 97β142 |
Chapters 1β5 end with a one-line bridge to the next (“Next: ⦔); chapter 6 ends with the contact CTA.
Page 0 β Landing: Seeing Your Business Better
Purpose: orient and route. Not a chapter β a doorway.
- 2β3 paragraphs, first person: “I help business owners see their businesses better. This series is the talk I give, written down.”
- Mission line (slide 13): To help everyone see their business better.
- Series table of contents with one-sentence hooks per page.
- Byline: “from the Weekly Accounting system” β weeklyaccounting.com/fullbook (repeats on every chapter page).
- Figure: title art (slide 1) β re-export without the “Show & Tell / Draft Version” watermark.
Page 1 β Driving with a Dirty Windshield
The problem story. Short, visceral, no jargon yet.
- Open with the scene (3β4): Running a business can feel like driving with a dirty windshield β while your accountant is carefully cleaning the back window. Keep both images.
- The app sprawl (5): You run the business off QuickBooks, Shopify, Facebook Ads, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Stripe, Chase, spreadsheets β each app a keyhole view.
- The matrix (6β7): Staring at all that data is like trying to see through the matrix. The result: you make decisions with bad information.
- What that costs (8β10): Growth flattens and you can’t say why (8); cash dwindles (9); it feels like spraying cash out the muffler to make the car go faster (10). Figures: the flat-revenue chart and cash-burn chart.
- Turn (11): There is a better way.
Pull quote: “You make decisions with bad information.” Figures: windshield photo, app-logo collage, flat-growth chart, cash chart, muffler image. Bridge: “Before I show you the better way, I should explain why an engineer β not an accountant β found it.”
Page 2 β A Sonar Engineer Looks at Accounting
Credibility chapter told as story, not rΓ©sumΓ©. First person throughout.
- Who I am (12, 16β17): Inventor of the Weekly Accounting System. Engineering degrees, sonar systems, GE Edison Program, HBS, consulting, investment banking. Land on: not an accountant.
- What sonar taught me (18β19): Sonars do what people do β sample the environment, separate signal from noise using a value system, make a map of the territory, decide from the map. People in business do the same thing.
- The 500-year-old map (20): Pacioli, 1494. Income statement, balance sheet, cash flow. “For 500 years, all accountants have done is make more rules.” Figure: Summa de Arithmetica page.
- The provocation (21): “A CPA is a license to do your books in a way that doesn’t help the business.” Verbatim β it’s the line audiences remember.
- Receipts (14β15): With The System: five $100M companies, a $100M fund, 19 exits (General Assembly, Second Life, HouseValuesβ¦). Logos as a single figure.
- Present day (2): Weekly Accounting itself β founded 2021, 200 customers, 500 companies, $4M revenue, self-funded, profitable. Practice what we preach; our own net-revenue-vs-customers chart.
Pull quote: the CPA line, or “The map they use is 500 years old.” Bridge: “So I built a new map. Here’s what it looks like.”
Page 3 β The Weekly Accounting System
The system chapter. This is the conceptual heart; keep it concrete with real screenshots.
- Step one: get all the data (22): Connect everything β QuickBooks, Shopify, ads, bank, CRM β and build an Integrated Financial Model (IFM). Figure: IFM screenshot.
- The new rowset (25, 42β43): The Statement of Economic Quality β Audience β Customer Roll Forward β Unit Economics β (Income Statement, Balance Sheet below). Walk the SEQ story arc (36β40): every business has an audience β converts it into new customers β keeps them coming back β from that, unit economics, each period and cumulatively.
- One model, every zoom level (26β30): Monthly, quarterly, annually β plus forecast (revenue growth and cash) and goals (performance metrics). Collapse these five build slides into one annotated figure.
- Run it weekly (31β35): Monday Morning Metrics β manage weekly and average weekly. The quote slide (33): “If you aren’t managing your business weekly, you are managing your business weakly.” Example: DTC Q3 goals and weekly variance vs forecast (34β35).
- Why it works (23, 44): It creates a feedback loop β unit economics and statements looking back, assumptions and forecast looking forward. And: “When you put the right data in front of an empowered team, they get better” (2x2 figure).
- Proof preview (45): Home-care client chart β care hours/day climbing after implementation, negative to positive gross margins. Tease the full journey (Page 5).
Pull quote: weekly/weakly. Bridge: “The engine inside the system is unit economics. Let’s open the hood.”
Page 4 β Unit Economics: The Frequency Codes of Your Business
The teaching chapter β closest to a reference guide, still first person. Consolidate the components diagram (appears at 24, 41, 47, 54, 101β¦) to one canonical figure used once here.
- Why bother (48β50): Know what it costs to acquire a customer, what each generates, what it costs to serve, profit per customer β so you know what to do next: spend more on marketing? do customers like the product? is the channel saturated? how much can I grow?
- The idea (51β53): Analyze the business per unit. Unit economics are the “frequency codes” of your business β a crystal ball: better forecasts, visible growth limiters, focused attention.
- The components (47): One diagram β Ad Spend + New Customers β CAC; Purchases/Customer Γ AOV Γ Gross Margin β LTGP; the headline ratio LTGP:CAC.
- CAC walkthrough (55β59): Ad spend (~$100β200k/mo) Γ· new customers (~1,000β1,500/mo) = CAC ($100β175). Monthly points bounce; the cumulative line is the signal in the noise (59 β key chart).
- LTGP walkthrough (60β68): The simple parts first β AOV ($200β$225 cumulatively) and gross margin (40β60% monthly, ~50% cumulative). Then purchases per customer: 85,601 orders Γ· 50,312 customers = 1.7x, grown from 1.5x.
- Deep-dive sidebar (69β71): Four real client PPC charts β “what insights can you draw?” Works as an interactive aside or collapsible section.
Pull quote: “The cumulatives are the signal in the noise.” Bridge: “Knowing the math is easy. Getting a company to live by it is the journey.”
Page 5 β Implementing Weekly Accounting
The change-management chapter. Honest about the awkward middle phase.
- It’s a journey (73β77): Troubled β Functional β Integrated β World Class. Maturity table (77) verbatim β data quality row (“monthly close by an accountant” β “the unit of work is self-aware”) and feels-like row (“We won’t know revenue until the books are closed” β “Where’d you get that data? That’s not right!” β “We know where to focus our attention” β “Every role has an intention and a rowset”).
- The three build steps (78β83): 1) Get access to all your business data. 2) Build the weekly data warehouse β Instrumentation Pyramid (Forecast / Run the Business / Common Transactional Detail) creating one clean source of transactional truth. 3) Build the toolkit β Monday Morning Metrics to run the week, IFM to forecast monthly/quarterly/annually.
- The common rowset in practice (84β88): SEQ from audience to cash; focus the team weekly on the drivers; track LTGP:CAC each period and cumulatively.
- Why weekly wins (90β92): Feedback loops make systems stable (damped-oscillation figure β Functional oscillates hard, World Class hums). 52 feedback loops a year beat 12. Calendar figure.
- Case study: the home-care company (93β95): Functional phase = the team aligning on what the numbers mean (that’s the “that’s not right!” period β normalize it). Then productivity climbs, margins flip positive. Right data + empowered team β things get better.
- Landing (89): “Once you see your business weekly, the old ways of seeing your business will seem quaint.”
Pull quote: 52 > 12, or “quaint.” Bridge: “Here’s what this looks like when the numbers turn against you β and the system catches it.”
Page 6 β Case Study: When Growth Is a Vanity Metric
The payoff chapter β the deck’s best story. Tell it as a mystery with the reveal in the numbers.
- The envy setup (98): DTC company: $20M annualized revenue, 6x growth, zero outside investors. Everyone wants to be them.
- The thesis (99β100): Revenue growth is a vanity metric. Unit economics are more important than the P&L.
- The clue (103β105): Ad spend scaling $30k β $500k/mo; new customers up β but CAC creeping $16 β $93.
- P&L by Customer (107β115): LTGP sets the CAC target. Build the per-customer P&L once, as one table: 4.3 orders Γ $84 AOV = $361 lifetime revenue Γ 29% GM = $106 LTGP; CAC $33 β $73 contribution per customer, 20% contribution margin, 3.2x LTGP:CAC. (Collapse the seven build slides.)
- The slide into trouble (116β120): Quarter by quarter: 3.2x β 2.4x β 1.8x β 1.1x in October. Meanwhile the standard statements show revenue up and net income shrinking β the P&L tells you something’s wrong; unit economics tell you what.
- Call it what it is (121β122): Running with unprofitable unit economics is not “investing in the business.” It’s spraying cash out the muffler. (Muffler image returns β callback to Page 1.)
- The fix (123β130): Go back to when it was good. Set a profitable CAC: maintain CAC < $45, Facebook < $325k/quarter (< $25k/week), on-platform ROAS > 53x. Sidebar: CAC vs on-platform ROAS (accurate/tied-to-cash/slow vs real-time/directional) β give the ad agency direction in ROAS terms.
- The objection and the punchline (131β132): “But if I have to reduce my ad spend, my business will shrink!” β “Exactly!!” Keep this beat intact; it’s the talk’s signature moment.
- The deeper law (133β140): Every channel saturates. A business is not limited by the size of the market β it’s limited by the size of the channels through which it can profitably acquire customers. Sigmoid figure: $300k already buys the ~1,600 customers the channel holds; the last $50k buys almost nothing. Spend less.
- What’s next for this company (142): Maximize contribution from the saturated channel; reduce ad spend and raise prices (LTGP:CAC > 2); find new channels to grow.
- Series close + CTA: Loop back to the windshield β this is what a clean windshield shows you. The series’ one service CTA: talk to us (contact/intake link), with the fullbook byline beneath.
Pull quotes: “Exactly!!” exchange; the size-of-channels law.
Coverage check (all 142 slides accounted for)
- 1β11 β Pages 0β1 Β· 12β21 β Page 2 Β· 22β45 β Page 3 Β· 46β71 β Page 4 Β· 72β96 β Page 5 Β· 97β142 β Page 6
- Repeats consolidated: components diagram (24, 41, 47, 54, 101β102), maturity table (77, 96), right-data 2x2 (44, 95), feedback-loop quadrant (23, 90), muffler (10, 122), “Exactly!!” (132, 141), P&L-October (119, 123), sigmoid variants (136β140), size-of-channels (134β135).
- Dropped: 128 (blank).
Production notes
- Re-export figures clean: remove “Show & Tell / Draft Version” watermark (1, 33) and stray notes (“What insights can you draw”, 71); charts at consistent size; page 20’s slide number cropped.
- Build sequences β single annotated figures: 26β30 (IFM zoom levels), 36β40 (SEQ arc), 109β115 (P&L by customer), 136β140 (sigmoid).
- No talk recordings yet β reserve a video slot at the top of each chapter template so recordings drop in later without a redesign.
- Use the “Zen and the Art of Weekly Accounting” divider art (e.g., 13, 46, 72, 97) as the visual motif opening each chapter.
- Define each metric (CAC, AOV, LTGP, SEQ, MER, contribution margin) on first use; consider a short glossary page linked from all six.
- Cross-link every mention of the SEQ, IFM, and MMM to their canonical sections.